Climate Psuedoscientists
Well, the thought that we are being deceived is not nat new. Anytime someone changes something there are
controversies. When the automobile was starting to take the place of the horse, there was the thought that it was a
government conspiracy to cripple the farmers.
I guess we can look at it from a business perspective, why would a government invest hundreds of millions of dollars
in something just to “trick” the public? That seems a bit much to me. The conspiracy would need to be world wide as
well. Scientists all over the world coming from different background have come to the same conclusion. I happen to
be part of the front line in developments and knowledge on the scientific front, so perhaps have information many do
not.
Another aspect is looking at it from a logistical perspective, have you ever seen the government put something so
large into place so quickly? What are the implications of that? Knowing that they have access to many of the leading
scientists, governments all across the world have implemented much the same approach.
Considering that we were not the first, but near the end of the line, of countries to be involved in the first
place, this would mean that smaller countries started this conspiracy and we just decided to join in…(?) What
would be the purpose? What finacnial objectives could there possibly be that would justify this?
Many theories have been put out by all the articles but no point is made. If the problem is that we do not know if
the world will suffer an ice age or a desert effect, what difference would it make if we know that we are
contributing to the problem and to future death tolls?
We could say that climate change is natural, which it is, and that what would the point be to alter the way we live;
but germs are natural too and yet we try to prevent deaths by giving vaccines. Can we guarantee that the bacteria or
virus would kill someone? No, but we have seen the amount of people die from such illnesses decline.
I guess we could wait and see, but if you are the type of person that gets a mammogram or a prostrate check or a
check up, I do not see why the logic would not apply here.
If the geovernment is covering something up, I am afraid it has to do with the severity of what we face. The common
person does not put things into perspective, and cannot corelate something on the other side of the world with their
home. Scientific models, unfortunately, are not accurate because we did not anticipate that the change would be so
great. There are many many factors involved with predictions on a global scale, many of the variables are changing
rapidly. Many people do not know that there have been halts in the hyaline belt of the ocean. This is of a greater
concern that what we are lead to believe. I happen to have the priveledge of being among discussions of the greatest
scientific minds here, and I can tell you they do not care about political office much less have anything to do with
covering something up or making up stories. These people have their reputation and their tenure on line when they
publish, they are very exacting.
If nothing else, take the personality of most scientists into account. They are diligent, if not fanatical, single
minded; almost absent minded on anything else. They scoff at people that write articles like this and do not care
that the populace thinks it is real. It is this fact that has been the scientific communities achilles heel.
So in the end, I guess it is up to each of us. Who benefits by spreading pseudo knowledge around on the internet?
What is the media playing to? What are each of their goals? Are they benefiting financially?
I sure as heck know that the pay scientists and college professors get, is not even a quarter of what media
spokespersons get. Ask your local professor.
Sites like this get their pay by having people blog on them and click the ads they have posted. The more
controversial your subject matter, the more people you get to your site, the more money you make. Same for media.
Unfortunately it does not work that way in the doctorate world usually- unless you put out a pseudo science book and
become popular, even then you run the risk of becoming a pariah among the community of scientists.
